Archive for the ‘Sourcing News’ Category

Claritum Launch new White Paper

Monday, June 7th, 2010

For most organisations complex indirect spend categories pose an opportunity for significant savings and efficiencies but are often seen as too challenging to address. Professional Services, Travel and Expense; Print and Marketing Procurement can represent substantial spends but require specialist expertise and technology platforms to achieve savings and efficiencies.

However, with cost pressure on most organisations, complex categories need to be considered a higher priority – especially as savings of 17-40% can be achieved.

Claritum have created a White Paper which focuses on one of the largest of these complex categories and is intended to demystify the approach to achieve savings and efficiencies. This is the first of a series of White Papers from Claritum addressing Print and Marketing Services Procurement.

Print and marketing services are surprisingly large spends for most organisations. Dependent on sector, this category can represent between 0.5% and 3% of revenues. According to research, expenditure on printed materials in the US totals US$167billion per annum and Euro243billion in Europe.

Yet much of this spend falls outside the visibility and control of a formal procurement program. According to Aberdeen, 80% of print is manually sourced using phone, fax and email; leading to higher than necessary costs, inefficiencies and errors.

Why? Print is typically difficult to capture and control as requirements are dispersed across the organisation and usually bought by whoever has the need. Marketing may have established long term relationships with suppliers or rely on their agencies to purchase print on their behalf – often at inflated margins. Most businesses and departments use printed materials and responsibility for buying it is often delegated to junior staff with little or no experience or understanding of what they are ordering.

Print can be a complex area of spend where minor variances in specification, date of order, production process or supplier selection having significant impacts on cost.

To download the full white paper FOR FREE please register your details here>>

Companies told to analyse spend to save money,

Friday, April 30th, 2010

Supply Management: Organisations are missing out on cost savings because of inadequate spend analysis, a report has found.

“Strategic spend visibility: Untapped potential for cost reduction” (sponsored by Rosslyn Analytics), examined the impact of spend visibility and analysis on companies’ returns. It estimated the potential losses from poor practices to be millions of dollars in terms of unrealised cost savings.

It highlighted that companies should adopt a more strategic and organisation-wide approach to spend visibility to not only incorporate transparency of what is bought and from whom, but also identification, tracking, reporting and analysis.

This should not solely be the remit of procurement and supply chain management, the report said, but become practice in other departments including finance, HR, IT, marketing and legal. This would enable companies to catch savings opportunities that might otherwise have been missed.

For example, savings from strategic sourcing could be increased by up to 12 per cent with better spend analysis, according to the report. It could also help get more spend under the control of procurement, potentially from 25 per cent to more than 75 per cent, and result in better control of maverick spending and greater contract compliance.
The report estimates that, on average, 80 per cent of organisations’ spending is with less than 20 per cent of its suppliers. A better understanding of where money goes could lead to consolidation of the supply base, which in turn could generate savings. In addition, improved spend visibility could facilitate better risk analysis by, for example, identifying potential disruptions to the supply chain as a result of being overly dependent on a single source of supply.

Claritum’s data driven spend analysis program enables Their Client’s to gain granular insight into their spend, or monitor performance of a current outsourcing arrangement, in order to achieve significant, measurable and sustainable savings and efficiencies.

Spend Analysis can be provided as a stand alone engagement, but when combined with Claritum’s sourcing and supplier management tools, client’s realise significant, measurable and sustainable savings, without compromising quality or performance.

59% Of US Companies see Cost Savings and Process Efficiencies as their key priority in the procurement of print.

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010

Initial research conducted by Claritum has shown that 59% Of US Companies see Cost Savings and Process Efficiencies as their key priority in the procurement of print.

Claritum (in conjunction with UK Trade and Industry) surveyed over 200 US Companies with a view to better understand their views on the procurement of indirect and complex categories.
The majority of those who responded (87%) spend between $3 and $10million on complex, indirect categories such as print and related services.

73% from the returned sample believe that effective print buying is just as important as any other indirect spend.

When asked about how print is purchased within their organisation, 68% were still using manual processes by either a central procurement function or the individual who has the need, with only 16% using and automated ERP or procurement platform.

The majority of companies indicated that cost saving and reducing the over all indirect spend (32%) as their top priority. Improved efficiency and effectiveness was also important (27%)

41% stated that granular/real-time visibility of indirect spends was “Very Important” where as 29% thought cost saving through competitive bidding was “Very Important”

72% felt cost savings through process automation was “Somewhat Important”

However 62% believed that monitoring buyer and supplier performance was “Medium to less important”

The survey is still available to complete, For Companies still wishing to take part, please follow the link - http://freeonlinesurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=fnrx31na32o8hf9726068

Managing Services Procurement Categories

Thursday, February 18th, 2010

New research by Spend Matters  suggests that organisations collectively spend over a trillion dollars per year on a range of services categories. From legal to marketing to print to outsourcing, organisational spending across a breadth of often complex and hard-to-manage services categories typically is large - significantly larger than most companies realise before analysing it - and decentralised. When companies first start to tackle complicated services categories, one of the major challenges they discover is that price is often just one component of many that factor into services spending decisions.

 

For a full look at the findings please log onto -  http://www.spendmatters.com/library/

Universities struggle with budget cuts.

Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010

The Department of Innovation, Universities and Skills (DIUS) has been instructed to save £1.9bn, including £400m in 2010-11, mainly through making the research councils, universities and colleges “more efficient” as a result of the 2009 budget.

Universities are worried that the savings will lead to a reduction in their overall funding, particularly for teaching, and for widening participation to low-income families and ethnic minorities.

Universities have been hard pressed to “do more with less.” With this backdrop, it not surprising for the public sectors to follow the lead of private companies in using advanced Sourcing and purchasing technologies hitherto available only to large organisations to drive down cost and improve efficiency.
With an On-Demand deployment model, companies pay predictable fees to gets the results of efficient strategic sourcing and competitive bidding without worrying about managing software and hardware or stretching their already slim IT staff to manage the technology infrastructure.

More and more Education and public sector organisations are using the power of these new Spend Management delivery platforms to achieve significant savings that can then be put to work in other areas. And the added intangible is that it also makes the Sourcing process more transparent.

James Samuels, CEO of Claritum Said - “We’re seeing huge demand for our SaaS spend management application from both private and public sectors. The combination of spend analysis, sourcing, e-procurement, supplier network and catalogue delivers significant and measurable benefits.

Our clients love the low upfront costs, small ongoing commitment leading to a quick ROI and significant hard cash savings. We have a number of leading Universities using the Claritum System, that have announced 17-25% savings and there’s more to come

Manufacturers should address indirect spend.

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010

Many Manufacturing organisaions need to focus more time and energy into Indirect spend areas.
 Large organisations typically focus on Direct Material sourcing activities as these are much easier to measure though Purchase or Material Price Variance (PPV or MPV). More mature sourcing organisations need to focus on “indirect” areas to continually drive savings impact.

There are a few obstacles that organisations need to overcome to address their Indirect Spend and a few ways to address them:

 

1. Unknown Spend- Because Indirect categories are usually not managed centrally, it is challenging for organisations to get their hands on the data. To solve this, they need to reach out to key suppliers for data collection. Most indirect suppliers will have good systems and can readily provide information on who (from an organisation) buys what from them.

 

2. Resistance to Change- Just because a supplier has been a supplier for a long time does not necessarily mean they are the best supplier in terms of price and other service requirements. Testing the market and potentially forcing a change may be in the best interest of an organisation.

 

3. Hard to Track Savings- Direct Material Savings are easy to track through PPV or MPV. Indirect savings are usually not as straight-forward to track. In addition to comparing old invoice price to new invoice price, organisations also need to take into consideration other factors such as demand management.

 

4. Lack of Procurement Influence/Control- Again, because savings are harder to track it may be tough to show Procurement’s value. Relationship building in the indirect area will need to happen gradually over time.

Cost of NOT Using Modern Supply Chain Systems: 6.8 Billion

Monday, November 30th, 2009

A recent article on CNN Money that noted that  US retailers lose $6.8 Billion a year due to poor  processing, supply chain errors, and frauds which could be eliminated with good systems and processes.

 
There’s should be no excuse for any sourcing, procurement and processing errors. Good end-to-end e-Procurement systems can match every invoice against the purchase order and contract and make sure you’re only paying for what you ordered at contracted rates. Good forecasting and inventory tracking systems will prevent costly errors. And good visibility systems will allow you to spot any exceptions as soon as they occur and stop frauds, and fraudsters, in the act.

 
The reduction in loss alone over their service life-time will more than pay for such a system. (Not to mention the savings that a good sourcing, e-procurement, or inventory system can help you identify!)

Cost-cutting remains top priority

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

Cutting costs will continue to be the most pressing issue for purchasing next year, according to a poll of delegates at the ProcureCon conference in Brussels this week.
 
In response to the question “What is the key issue for your department in 2010?”, almost one-third (32 per cent) said it was reducing costs by 5 per cent or more.

Managing risk and maintaining continuity of supply was voted the second most important issue.

Asked “What has helped increase your organisation’s efficiency most?”, 36 per cent gave the answer SRM, while 20 per cent said shared service and purchase-to-pay technology has proved most effective. For 16 per cent, outsourcing and offshoring had led to greater efficiency and a further 16 per cent had seen the greatest improvements through e-sourcing and e-auctions.

Für Implementierungen als SaaS-Modell geeignet

Monday, November 2nd, 2009

MicroStrategy, Anbieterin von Business Intelligence-Software (BI), gab die Erweiterung ihres OEM-Programms um neue Produktfunktionen für “Software-as-a-Service”-Unternehmen (SaaS) bekannt. Die BI-Plattform des Unternehmens stellt integrierte Reporting- und Analysefunktionen bereit. Softwareunternehmen und Technologieanbietern können ihr vorhandenes Produktangebot, um Funktionen für Reporting, Dashboarding, Analyse und automatische Warnmeldungen erweitern.

 

Mit dem aktuellen Release “MicroStrategy 9″ bietet das BI-Unternehmen besonders für das SaaS-Modell geeignete neue Funktionen. Diese umfassen unter anderem erweiterte Designfunktionen für Fachanwender, In-Memory-BI für eine höhere Datenskalierbarkeit in größeren mandantenfähigen Systemen und eine verbesserte Sicherheit bei der Integration mit Drittanbietern. Zudem unterstützt eine vereinfachte Plug-in-Architektur und die Möglichkeit unternehmensspezifische, eigene mehrsprachige Reporting-Terminologien innerhalb derselben Multi-Mandanten-Anwendung zu verwenden, den Einsatz im SaaS Umfeld.

 

Die MicroStrategy BI-Plattform ist bestens für Implementierungen als SaaS-Modell geeignet:

• Skalierbarkeit und hohe Leistung für wachsende mandantenfähige Umgebungen

• Einheitliche Metadaten zur Minimierung von Entwicklungs- und Wartungsaufwand

• Zentrale Administration zur Senkung der Supportkosten

• Umfassendes Sicherheitsmodelll für die Nutzung und den Schutz sensibler Daten

• Skalierbarkeit auf mehrere tausend Benutzer

• Intuitive Bedienung für unterschiedlichste Anwendergruppen

• Offene Plattform zur Anpassung, Personalisierung und für das Re-Branding

• Entwicklungsumgebung für Internationalisierung und Sprachvarianten

 

Die Zahl der MicroStrategy-OEM-Partner wächst stetig. Dabei verzeichnen Unternehmen, die mit ihren BI-Implementierungen auf das SaaS-Modell mit MicroStrategy setzen, im OEM-Programm den größten Wachstumsanteil. Zu den SaaS-Anbietern, die kürzlich dem MicroStrategy-OEM-Programm beigetreten sind, zählen u. a. Autologue (USA), Claritum (GB), FreeWheel Media (USA), GAPbuster (Australien), TradeBeam (USA) und Xtiva (USA).

 

“SaaS-BI-Lösungen entwickeln sich zu einer zunehmend attraktiven Alternative für Unternehmen, die unternehmensweit wichtige BI-Daten nutzen wollen, aber nicht über die Ressourcen verfügen, diese Technologien im eigenen Hause zu implementieren”, so Sanju Bansal, COO bei MicroStrategy. “Unternehmen, die ein SaaS-Modell anbieten, finden in MicroStrategy einen Partner, der es ihnen ermöglicht, eine flexible und skalierbare, mandantenfähige BI-Architektur äußerst kostengünstig aufzubauen.”

MicroStrategy enrichit son programme OEM de nouvelles capacités technologiques pour les éditeurs SaaS

Monday, November 2nd, 2009

MicroStrategy® Incorporated (Nasdaq : MSTR), le leader mondial de la Business Intelligence (BI) d’entreprise, annonce l’extension de son programme OEM avec des nouveautés technologiques destinées aux éditeurs SaaS (Software-as-a-Service).

 

La plate-forme décisionnelle de MicroStrategy intègre des outils de reporting et d’analyse qui permettent aux éditeurs de logiciels et fournisseurs d’ajouter facilement (avec un minimum de coûts et de ressources de développement) des applications de reporting, de création de tableaux de bord, d’analyse et d’alerte ? leurs offres de produits. Les éditeurs SaaS choisissent MicroStrategy pour son évolutivité, ses possibilités de personnalisation et ses fonctions de sécurité.

 

MicroStrategy 9, dernière version de la plate-forme, offre de nouvelles capacités spécialement conçues pour les éditeurs SaaS, notamment : des fonctions améliorées de conception pour l’utilisateur final, une BI en mémoire pour accueillir un volume supérieur de données dans les systèmes partagés, une intégration plus sûre aux outils tiers, une architecture plug-in facilitant la personnalisation et une possibilité pour différentes entreprises d’utiliser leur propre terminologie de reporting, en plusieurs langues, dans la même application partagée.

 

La plate-forme décisionnelle MicroStrategy répond parfaitement aux exigences des éditeurs SaaS pour les déploiements BI :

• Évolutivité et performances élevées pour les environnements partagés en expansion

• Métadonnées unifiées pour réduire au minimum les efforts de développement et de maintenance

• Administration centralisée pour réduire les coûts et ressources de support

• Modèle complet de sécurité pour distribuer et protéger les données sensibles

• Évolutivité pour accueillir des milliers d’utilisateurs

• Facilité d’emploi pour une communauté d’utilisateurs très diversifiée

• Plate-forme ouverte qui facilité l’intégration, la personnalisation et le rebranding

• Capacités de développement pour gérer l’internationalisation et les dialectes

 

Le portefeuille de partenaires OEM de MicroStrategy n’a cessé de se développer, les sociétés qui choisissent MicroStrategy pour leurs déploiements BI SaaS représentant le plus important secteur de croissance du programme OEM. Parmi les éditeurs SaaS qui ont récemment rejoint ce programme, on trouve Autologue (États-Unis), Claritum (Royaume-Uni), FreeWheel Media (États-Unis), GAPbuster (Australie), TradeBeam (États-Unis) et Xtiva (États-Unis).

 

« La plate-forme décisionnelle de MicroStrategy contient les outils de sécurité, de personnalisation et Web en self-service requises pour offrir une solution matérielle, logicielle et applicative unique, tout en répondant toujours aux besoins spécifiques des clients », explique Daniel Schmidt, CIO de Constellation Software. « Cette capacité, associée à une évolutivité pour accueillir de nombreux utilisateurs et d’importants volumes de données, fait de MicroStrategy la plate-forme décisionnelle idéale pour les déploiements SaaS partagés. »

 

« Les solutions décisionnelles SaaS représentent une alternative de plus en plus attirante pour les entreprises qui doivent partager des données décisionnelles essentielles dans l’ensemble de leur structure, mais qui ne disposent pas de ressources suffisantes pour l’implémentation et la maintenance de ces technologies en interne », conclut Sanju Bansal, COO de MicroStrategy. « Avec MicroStrategy, les entreprises qui proposent un modèle SaaS peuvent créer, de façon extr?mement rentable, une architecture BI flexible, évolutive et partagée. »

 

Pour plus d’informations sur le programme OEM de MicroStrategy, consulter notre site web : http://www.microStrategy.com/partners/OEM